top of page

QUARTERLY / 2023
Digital Asset Legal Review 

The legal landscape surrounding digital assets is constantly evolving, making it increasingly difficult to keep up with the latest developments. Ontier's latest resource offers a solution: a comprehensive resource that tracks and summarises the most important quarterly judgments in the world of digital assets. Our aim is to provide fellow professionals with the tools and insights needed to stay ahead of the game, and confidently navigate this exciting area of law. 

Authors

Ontier_19_10_22_0281.jpg

Felicity Potter

PARTNER (UK)

felicity.potter@ontier.net

Ontier_19_10_22_1080.jpg

Alexander Unal

ASSOCIATE (UK)

alexander.unal@ontier.co.uk

Ontier_06_04_23_15394.jpg

David McCoy

CONSULTANT (UK)

david.mccoy@ontier.co.uk

1.png

Serena Tam

ASSOCIATE (UK)

serena.tam@ontier.co.uk

Q1

Q1

Two significant judgments delivered during this quarter may pave the way to stronger remedies for owners of digital assets. The Court of Appeal in Tulip Trading Limited v van der Laan and others [2023] EWCA Civ 83 held the question of whether software developers of a given Bitcoin network could be subject to fiduciary and tortious duties to users of the network should proceed to trial. The High Court in Osbourne v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 340 (KB) held that there was a “realistically arguable case” that NFTs could be classed as 'property' as a matter of English law, potentially widening the scope of proprietary injunctions to include a new class of digital assets. A notable feature that these judgments share is that they were both delivered in the context of digital asset recovery claims issued in the High Court.

bottom of page